LISTINGS |  EDITOR'S PICKS | NEWS | MUSIC | MOVIES | DINING | LIFE | ARTS | REC ROOM | CLASSIFIEDS | VIDEO

The truth behind the MBTA fare hike

How the state is screwing T riders
June 1, 2006 9:43:01 AM


THE TRUTH BEHIND THE FARE HIKE: If you're wondering who in the current negotiations over a proposed MBTA fare increase is representing the interests of the T rider and the taxpayer, the answer appears to be nobody.

If you ride the T, you're about to be jerked around more than ever before.

The rise the Massachusetts Bay Transit Authority (MBTA) got out of you when you read the news that a single T ride would jump from $1.25 to $1.70 was planned, expected, and, some might say, even welcome. The disgust on your face when you read that the outbound Green Line would no longer be free? They were hoping for that as well. You will no longer be able to buy a T-only monthly pass for $44 -- just a combo pass for $66? The one-time bus fare going up from $0.90 to $1.25? Those, too. Stomp your feet, shake your fists, spit on the ground.

As John and Jill Q. Public, you are consistently pawns in battles beyond your control -- from the Big Dig to the city's aggressive community development. And when the MBTA announced its plans for a massive fare hike two weeks ago, it wrapped its hands around your neck and moved you two spaces forward in the first move of what is shaping up to be a nasty chess game between the state and the transit-workers' union. Be prepared to see the MBTA blame your commuting woes on its supposedly sour budget, to watch a presidential hopeful seeking Republican glory play hardball with labor, and to hear talk of a transit strike by a union crying poor mouth (but whose workers get tremendous pension benefits and free health care for life).

Believe it or not, the next two months provide a golden opportunity to improve the MBTA. With gas prices soaring, a whole new group of commuters are thinking of switching to public transportation, which means revenue could increase significantly if the T can attract and keep those riders. A state commission on transportation financing is widely expected to recommend fixing the way the state funds the MBTA, while a major transportation-bond bill, soon to be submitted by Governor Mitt Romney, provides the perfect vehicle for imposing those changes -- and for linking that funding to service improvements. And new systems technology, including the automated fare-collection system now being rolled out, makes it possible to save money while assessing and analyzing levels of service.

Massachusetts could use this combination of technology, funding sources, and labor agreements to establish the means and incentives to improve transit service while keeping it affordable -- as other cities have done, notably Chicago.

But none of that is part of the public conversation or political agenda. None of the players -- the Romney administration, MBTA executives, state legislators, and union negotiators -- want people talking about any of that.

What they want is to jerk you around to suit their own agendas. Which is why you have been told that you'll soon be paying 45 cents more for each T ride you take.

It is why, for example, nobody has disputed the MBTA's claim that its fare structure "is among the lowest of comparable major transit properties." It's true that Boston remains one of the few major cities where you can catch a bus for less than a buck. But the lack of a subway-bus transfer makes that common two-part trek more expensive than in similar cities, while Boston's monthly subway-bus-combo pass is one of the most expensive in the country. (See sidebar, "Cheap Ride?")

It is also why the MBTA followed its rate-hike announcement by distributing a 24-page pamphlet to the public last week, suggesting that, due to the MBTA's "bleak" financial position, it must either raise rates or "customers would experience the most drastic service reduction in MBTA history." This is the kind of public-relations effort that companies often undertake when trying to force concessions from unions during labor negotiations -- which is exactly what's happening at the MBTA: the contract is up on June 30.

Instead of luring riders to the T, the state is announcing massive fare hikes -- almost a dollar more for a roundtrip. Instead of releasing its already-late report on reforming T funding (which was due six months ago), the Transportation Finance Commission has postponed it until the end of the year. Instead of addressing MBTA financing in the state bond bill or the state budget, the administration and legislature are passing on the issue -- at least for now. Instead of discussing service goals, the unions are fighting solely to maintain the best benefits on the planet and to increase wages.

If you're wondering who in all of this is representing the interests of the T rider and the taxpayer, the answer appears to be nobody.


pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
COMMENTS

It's one of the lowest priced subway lines in the country because the price matches the service. Monday through Friday, I take the silver, red, and green lines with an occasionally run in with the orange line if the silver line decides not to come (which happens OFTEN... I'll leave my apartment and see TWO silver line buses pass, one after another, and another one won't come by for another 20 minutes.. why even post a schedule online?). None of them run on time, with the exception of the green line when it initially leaves Lechmere. With all the hikes, it just seems like the subway system is trying to be like NYC. The thing is, over there subway fare is $2 and their subway runs overnight. We'll have around the same fare price, with no overnight service.. but no worries folks.. we'll have fun new turnstiles (another waste of money in my opinion.. they had to hire people to look after the new turnstiles.. when those people could have just been used to work in booths.. money wasted on turnstiles and labor). Where am I going with this? Hell if I know.. I have so many complaints.. as do many people.. but will they say anything so that the fare doesn't go up? No. When it comes to the T, no one wants to say anything because they think it won't make a difference. Kind of like that whole election thing. Ha.

POSTED BY newskimmer AT 05/11/06 9:37 AM
Could you perhaps proofread these articles before publishing them? (See the use of "its'" in the "Cheaper Ride?" and "Money in, Money out" insets - as well as "these's" in the latter).

POSTED BY ichlugebullets AT 05/11/06 10:05 AM
First off, can we get a standardized clock system at every station. Davis has no where that indicates what time it is there. I don't have a cell phone, and I don't wear a watch. I know I'm in the minority there, but a clock at every station would give me an idea when a bus was going to come. Also, can we do away with the backhand agreement with the cab companies and let the T run Friday and Saturday nights. Would it be so hard to run one train an hour with a set time to leave every stop. And if we implimented the standardized clock then we'd know when it was leaving. Is it really that hard to run 1 train an hour 2 nights a week. I wouldn't care if it took me 30 minutes to get from Downtown Crossing to Davis if I didn't have to pay for a cab. Hell, you could probably charge 3-4 dollars for the late night ride and people would pay.

POSTED BY Matt AT 05/11/06 10:54 AM
I actually don't mind the implementation of fares on the Green Line for Outbound service. Hopefully, it will curb the massive crowds of students getting on, riding one or two stops, standing right in front of the doors, and making it generally difficult for those of us with longer commutes.

POSTED BY bradstorch AT 05/11/06 12:01 PM
Tempest in a teacup... As riders of one of the few functional public transport systems in the United States, we should be able to stomach a flat $2 ride fee. Comparisons with NYC are unmerited: with 20 million inhabitants, you can do things that just aren't possible with 6 million. A better comparison is Philadelphia, with a similar population and massive racial divisions that mean that - for the most part - only poor non-whites ride public transportation. Be happy you live somewhere sane: neither $2 a ride, out or in on the green line, or $66 a month for a t/bus ticket are too much. Improvements can be made, but quit kvetching about what's already an excellent and functional urban system.

POSTED BY ret AT 05/11/06 12:13 PM
You're the only person in the city that thinks this is "an excellent and functional urban system." First off, they can't even keep their escalators working when hundreds of buildings downtown don't have the same failure rate. Second, they print schedules but don't actually care about showing up at the scheduled times. Third, the MBTA compares itself to other cities as far as the fare but these other cities also have 10x better service and longer hours. Fourth, can you say maintenance? Apparently things only get fixed at the T when people start to confuse stations for being abandoned. Fifth, strangely a lot of former management at the T seems to have formed companies and coincidently seems to be lucky at winning cushy contracts. Sixth, the new fare collection system was poorly planned, it will increase trash from used cards everywhere and will be a joke when the machines all over the city stop working because the T doesn't maintain. Notice how turnstiles and automated fair machines work now. Seventh, a lot of MBTA employees seem to miss work frequently, lets hope some new penalties are created in the negotiations to reduce this. Eighth, Why does every single service have entirely different type of equipment? This surely adds to the maintaince cost, maybe we could make plans to update the system to all use the same equipment and how about trains from the 90s at least? I'll stop here but I could keep going for a while. The truth is the T works sometimes but when it fails, it really really fails.

POSTED BY DarkPrincess AT 05/11/06 12:48 PM
If you're frustrated with the T and want to get involved to make changes, check out Bostonians for Transit Change: //masstransit.meetup.com/21/

POSTED BY DarkPrincess AT 05/11/06 3:09 PM
What kills me is that we have the oldest subway system in the country and perhaps the best civil engineering school in the world, MIT, and they can't figure out How to run on a schedule. Yeah Boston, you are sooo full of smart, talented people.

POSTED BY Flytrap AT 05/12/06 12:06 AM
"customers would experience the most drastic service reduction in MBTA history." Yesterday (5/15), in the afternoon, the track switch on B Green line was broken, and the train had to wait forever. In the morning I had to change trains because one of them broke. Every morning I have to wait at Kenmore for the train on the other track going in the same direction to pass us by - our train just stands at the platform. And quite often the B line train gets 'rerouted' at Park Street, so I have to wait for the next train to Govt Center. WHAT @#!*%$^ SERVICE?!!! Maybe MBTA should fire all those union workers and hire some illegal immigrants. These people at least do their job well.

POSTED BY MB AT 05/16/06 8:39 AM
Hopefully we'll eventually get some sort of peak-pricing. The T should charge more for rush hour rides, and less for after hours rides. Rush hour trains and buses are very full, and the rider saves on parking, so it would be fair to have me pay more to take the T to work. After hour trains can get very empty. Free parking is generally available at night, so it would be fair for me to have to pay less to take the T for liesure.

POSTED BY sat AT 05/26/06 1:23 PM
Hopefully we'll eventually get some sort of peak-pricing. The T should charge more for rush hour rides, and less for after hours rides. Rush hour trains and buses are very full, and the rider saves on parking, so it would be fair to have me pay more to take the T to work. After hour trains can get very empty. Free parking is generally available at night, so it would be fair for me to have to pay less to take the T for liesure.

POSTED BY sat AT 05/26/06 1:25 PM
It makes no sense in this day and age where were trying to encourage alternative transportation that we should be doing any price increase for transit that isn't in line with keeping up with inflation of the dollar. Then again its still cheaper than the high insurance rates and the price of gas.

POSTED BY kris AT 06/01/06 6:40 PM
It makes no sense in this day and age where were trying to encourage alternative transportation that we should be doing any price increase for transit that isn't in line with keeping up with inflation of the dollar. Then again its still cheaper than the high insurance rates and the price of gas.

POSTED BY kris AT 06/01/06 6:41 PM
It makes no sense in this day and age where were trying to encourage alternative transportation that we should be doing any price increase for transit that isn't in line with keeping up with inflation of the dollar. Then again its still cheaper than the high insurance rates and the price of gas.

POSTED BY kris AT 06/01/06 6:42 PM
I went to school in Mass. for about a year and loved to ride the t-train into Boston once a week. The last time I was up there the round trip ticket from Salem was about $7.40, almost double what I remember. In NY the same distance is only $4.00.

POSTED BY kris AT 06/01/06 6:47 PM
I love how the riders that are dependant on this inefficient, overpriced, ridiculousness of a transit system have no say in anything that will happen. This article basically tells us that everything is out of our hands. The people who DON'T ride the T because they can afford cars and parking are making all the decisions. The cost of living in Boston keeps getting higher and higher, yet incomes have remained the same. We can go to the "workshops" and meetings, complain, and we will, for all our effort and ideas and advice, get no change. We will still get shoddy service, rude drivers, inefficiency, and in the end, we'll have to pay more for it. And they know we don't have a choice, because we are dependant on using them to get where we need to be. If only it was possible to stage a huge rider strike, where we refuse to ride the MBTA until we get the service and affordability that we deserve. Why are the unions the only ones that get to stage strikes for more pay and better benefits? Why don't we take this matter into our own hands?

POSTED BY SerendipitouslyNG AT 06/05/06 8:51 AM
I think the biggest problem with the T is that no one can seem to figure out how to pay thier fare on the buses or streetcars. They just stand there with a dollor bill in there hand and cause everyone to miss their bus or commuter rail connection. Heaven forbid if anyone needs to make an airline connection. Common courtesy: have your fare ready before baording the bus/train. Also, why does everyone on the Grrenline stand in the doorways blocking everyone from getting on or off the bus/train. There are handrails in the stairwells- elderly and handicapped people need to have acces to those handrails to pull themselves up the steps. Pleas show basic consideration and move up the steps. PLEEZE!!!!.

POSTED BY robot1022 AT 10/14/06 10:20 PM

Login to add comments to this article
Email

Password




Register Now  |   Lost password


MOST POPULAR

ADVERTISEMENT

BY THIS AUTHOR
  • KING SAID GEORGE ROMNEY DIDN'T MARCH:   But, as usual, the truth wasn't good enough for Mitt
  • THE AMAZING RACE:   We break down the Presidential campaign to its six essential parts, and predict your next Commander-in-Chief.
  • WAS IT ALL A DREAM?:   EXCLUSIVE: Mitt Romney claims that his father marched with MLK, but the record says otherwise
  • THE PASSION OF THE CANDIDATE:   Romney’s religion speech was aimed at Christian conservatives, but his model wasn’t JFK — it was Mel Gibson
  • MENINO’S HIT LIST:   40 potential candidates for the 2009 election who could take on the mayor — if they have the courage.
  • MIRTH DAY:   The idea of a consumer-led environmental movement has pollution-belching multi-nationals rolling in the aisles — and the joke is on you
  • GUINEA PIGS:   The future of the nation’s health-care reform rests on the tattooed shoulders of Massachusetts’s young adults
  • MURPHY’S BIG TENT:   In his bid for re-election, city councilor Stephen Murphy has collected a combustible group of allies, from Dapper to Deval
  • THE LEFT, LEFT OUT?:   Deval Patrick’s famed grassroots progressives are losing steam and influence
  • VOTO PARA MI?:   Why can’t a Latina candidate mobilize Eastie’s Hispanics?

PHOENIX MEDIA GROUP
CLASSIFIEDS







TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
   
Copyright © 2008 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group