LISTINGS |  EDITOR'S PICKS | NEWS | MUSIC | MOVIES | DINING | LIFE | ARTS | REC ROOM | CLASSIFIEDS | VIDEO

Shriiimp on the Barbie

Allston-based graffiti artists are giving new meaning to objets d’art
October 3, 2007 12:54:23 PM

Shrimp, the edible crustaceans commonly dipped in tart, tangy cocktail sauce, don’t usually carry overtly sexual connotations. That association is saved for more aphrodisiacal mollusks, such as oysters. But Shriiimp, the Allston and Montreal–based Web site and graffiti-artists’ collective, is superabundantly sexual. By painting graffiti on women’s bodies, Shriiimp (yes, with three i’s) conceptually entwines urban art and sexuality until the two are virtually indistinguishable.

Shriiimp artists are graffiti adventurers who occasionally trade cans of spray paint and city walls (their most common canvases) for non-toxic paint markers and the (preferably naked) female form. But their work doesn’t end there. In an important development for artists who continually battle ephemerality, they’ve taken to photographing semi-nude-ladies-cum-canvases and posting the images on the Web site shriiimp.com. A meeting ground and artistic outlet, it’s become a place to offer praise, criticism, and the occasionally troubling misogynistic comment. (While you’re there, you can also purchase paint markers and underwear from the online boutique.) But Shriiimp hasn’t forsaken the streets for cyber space; it hosts live-art shows — pastiches of gallery openings, performance art, and dance parties — where artists paint volunteer models before an audience. Their most recent local show was in July. Another is tentatively scheduled for early November.

Curtis McMillan, an Allstonian, part-time art teacher, and one of Shriiimp’s four masterminds, refers to the Web site as a gallery and views the posted photos as art — a characterization with which most graffiti enthusiasts would agree. Still, not everyone who stumbles across the site will see it that way. Shriiimp photos, after all, are always at least semi-nude, often explicit, and always of women. To some, it can seem like porn for graffiti fetishists.

But the Shriiimp creators swear that’s not what it’s about. “It’s more about the artwork than it is about the girl,” says McMillan. In fact, he claims, Shriiimp can make women feel more beautiful. “No matter how you feel about your body on an everyday basis, when you’re the canvas for a beautiful piece of work, that’s got to make you feel good.”

On a recent Saturday afternoon, a group of Shriiimp artists and models gather in the back of LAB, an urban-themed clothing store/art gallery near Allston Village, to demonstrate the process of “shriiimping” (Shriiimpers also use the word as a verb). As wandering shoppers thumb through racks of sale-price shorts and tank tops, and LAB co-owner Todd MacLeod blasts remixes of ’80s pop hits from his Mac at the front of the shop, the Shriiimp crew throws down a white sheet, plastic-covered crates, and several chairs in the back. McMillan, tall and tattooed with black glasses, alternates between calling late-to-the-party artists on his cell phone and rolling cigarettes, then heading outside to smoke them. Angel Buckley of Brockton, a go-go dancer with blonde and pink hair extensions, peruses LAB’s collection of electronic music on vinyl. Lyndsey Almon, 24, a tall interior designer from Cambridge, mills around in plaid shorts, a cropped hoodie, and blood-red heels, eagerly awaiting her turn to get shriiimped. Almon has been a model in two Shriiimp shows, one in Boston and one in Connecticut. “Graffiti is such an awesome art form,” she says. “But it’s illegal to tag anything in the city. So why not tag us?”

Nearby, Diane Levy — a Milton-based mash-up DJ, and Shriiimp’s model coordinator — sits on a chair with her black skirt hiked up high enough to expose a skin canvas for artists Kenji Nakayama and Mitchell Kehe, who are seated on either side of her. “Being model coordinator means I have to model sometimes,” she says with a smile, as Nakayama paints Warhol-esque bananas on one of her kneecaps and Kehe paints a head that resembles Boris Yeltsin on the opposite thigh. Levy calls models to prep them before shows. “If a female calls the models,” she says, “it doesn’t seem so shady.”

Within an hour, a group of graffiti artists have trooped in, each accompanied by an overflowing toolbox of paint markers and brightly colored canisters of acrylic paint. An artist in a black Iron Maiden T-shirt and a backwards Sox hat, whose nom de graffiti is Turn, works on Almon’s stomach, drawing a large green-haired head. The crazy-eyed character has an agape mouth and an extended tongue that just barely grazes the top of Almon’s shorts. Nearby, Buckley has stripped to a pink and black lingerie set, and Justin, an artist from New Bedford, paints a series of pink drips seemingly connected to her bra. With his girlfriend watching nearby, Justin adds a large, swirling block-letter tag that reads “Angel,” extending from Buckley’s stomach, down the side of her leg. The overlapping artwork on the model’s body suddenly looks remarkably similar to a city wall that’s been tagged and repainted innumerable times.

The sense of respect for the models in the room is palpable. Each of the graffiti artists works intently, lost in a world of artistic concentration and seemingly unaware that they are touching attractive, minimally clothed women. The models, oddly enough, also seem at ease. “There are always going to be haters and people that judge this the wrong way,” says Buckley. “It’s important that women are just comfortable in their skin.”


pages: 1 | 2
COMMENTS

I would like to thank everyone for reading about us at Shriiimp.com Few fast things that got put down wrong. My best friend goes by Akuma not Aquma. Ert O’Hara must be nuts, because one of the biggest artist on Shriiimp is a girl. {e}xotic does more work then half the guys on the site. So if we are misogynistic what does that make her? Also we are doing events in the next few months at two big gay events. The site is about Graff on Girls, and the guys on the site are a little ruff, but that’s not what we want to show, we want people to be able to see Graff as art, and be able to showcase in a nightclub. We can rock more then just walls. Curtis (Shriiimp.com)

POSTED BY WhenGraffgoesbad AT 10/03/07 11:14 PM
While I found this article to be pretty interesting and informative, I have to correct Ms. Curran regarding Ert O'Hara's "online graffiti ’zine called Juxtapose". First of all, Juxtapoz Magazine (God only knows where you learned how to spell your version--come on, "Juxtapose"?!?)is one of the leading underground and "lo-brow" art magazines in the world. The publication is hardly an "online graffiti 'zine". The publication, as well as it's online counterpart, is a well-researched and established arts magazine. Perhaps Ms. Curran needs to learn how to actually use this newfangled "series of tubes" that's all the rage among the youth these days called the "internet" to actually research material for her stories, rather than winging it and making herself look like a complete idiot.

POSTED BY NewApeVee AT 10/04/07 3:26 PM
WOW! "Juxtapose"...I found this article insanely horrible and it boggles my mind how the phoenix could print this steaming pile of shit!

POSTED BY MISTER ETIPS AT 10/04/07 5:57 PM
Dear Editor or The Boston Phoenix, Hi my name is Angel and I recently did a shoot for Shriiimp Graffiti, which is a body paint form of art using skin as a canvas I'm currently in your Oct 4-11 issue. I just want to say first and foremost I had fun over all working for Curtis the shriiimp graffiti manager, and his artists. He's very professional to work with and he was truly thoughtful in giving me the opportunity for great exposure, and helping me expand my own personal portfolio for modeling and go go dancing. I was fine with volunteering my time to be in your paper and I was grateful he asked me, being this would be my first shoot with them. On top of that it would the shoot would be at "Lab" which is me and my boyfriends favorite record shop in Boston, we love going there by the way he was there as well as my artists girlfriend. Basically I found myself disappointed with Caitlin Curran part in this story as I feel I was there to model for shriiimp and didn't expect her to write up like she did about me and the other girls She didn't have me sign anything giving her permission to print my full name, where I'm from and then on top of that portray me not at all the woman I am, taking bits and pieces of what I said to her...I wish she took the time to think hey these girls are here to model, as that is what we were there for the story was about Shriiimp. I am a respected woman by many both woman and men I have worked hard to not have a sleezy reputation and I don't appreciate her choice to write about me like that. I think you deserve to have better writers for your amazing music and arts paper. I wanted to feel proud of this but now I just tell most I guess you need to watch what say and never believe what you read and its so true...this is truly what shady media people do now don't they. She had plenty of good stuff there to work with just off the good things we had to share with her there was no need for trash talk...making it out like Shriiimp is degrading to woman even going as far to compare it to porn ..these people work hard, everyone there put their time into this so why waste anybodies time?? just to write trash making woman look ditsy and slutty. We should feel proud, this is art, and this was a great opportunity for her to write a good write up about a art form that has been judged...these artists can't just paint anywhere or they get in trouble and most of the artists are guys so most feel uncomfortable touching other men it's just common sense..for them to choose a woman's form over a mans, but I'm sure they will keep growing and woman artist will be added to their team, and men then may then want to volunteer to be a canvas. Point is this she used my full name in your paper without my permission and then chose to write me in the wrong light...I don't want people judging me the wrong way or ever be put in harms way there are crazy people out there and I don't want them knowing my information like that if I'm going o be portrayed as easy or pornographic I'm a mother too.She should have been thinking of us girls safety and portraying us without class is wrong we deserve to be treated with respect. Apparently without us she wouldn't had a story to tell doesn't she realize it's normal to wear bikini's or even lingerie as a model? Has she not seen magazines before?Being it is in fact 2007 I feel the story is more of her own opinion was suppose to be about Shriimp, and graffiti art, not some stirred up controversy? I truly feel she was against what we were doing when I felt she was there to make us look good.I would definitely want her to have to publicly rewrite the story or apologize in your paper to me and everyone one else.I feel everyone in that story was excited, waiting for it to come out then to read that was disappointing I want to say to so many hey I'm on the cover of the Phoenix this week but don't bother reading the article she wrote about Shriiimp and me...she wasn't even for what we do. I don't even want people reading it now, I'm proud and flattered by the pictures, the opportunity to work with your paper and Shriiimp but no thanks for her story. My time is valuable to me so when I put time into something I want to feel good about it the only part or this whole experience was her way of writing. I loved the photos and didn't expect to be on the cover which was flattering your photographer was fun and professional, everyone there was but her. I would not have a problem working with anyone but her again, this, has taught me alot about how to talk to media, the laws, and that people are not allowed to just write up anything without your permission. Asking some questions is one thing but making a person aware you are in fact going to print and write what they say is a whole other thing...so make sure you tell her that and your other writers to avoid time wasted or any further problems like this. Thank you for your time Angel

POSTED BY WhenGraffgoesbad AT 10/10/07 8:25 AM
what are you douches talking about? yea there was a spelling mistake but the article itself was respectful and balanced. and Angel dude it sounds like your case may have to be thrown out of court on lack of merit. the piece didn't disparage you at all or make you look bad. you just might be a twee' sensitive. and maybe you've just had an experiential learning experience regarding giving quotes to publications.

POSTED BY ben AT 10/11/07 11:48 AM

Login to add comments to this article
Email

Password




Register Now  |   Lost password


MOST POPULAR

 VIEWED   EMAILED 

ADVERTISEMENT

BY THIS AUTHOR

PHOENIX MEDIA GROUP
CLASSIFIEDS







TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
   
Copyright © 2007 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group