The Phoenix Network:
 
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Moonsigns  |  BandGuide  |  Blogs
 
 
December 04, 2008

Has CVS Met Its Match? Is It You?

 

What happens when literally thousands of community, immigrant, and minority groups unite to protest one titanic corporation? In the case of CVS Caremark versus the extraordinarily encompassing Change to Win consumer advocacy force, we’ll have to wait and see.

So far it appears that both sides are prepared for more than just a street fight. The claims waged by Change to Win – that CVS policies are negligent, predatory, and discriminatory – are serious ones. And while the pharmacy behemoth has faced harsh allegations before, execs might have met their best-organized opponent yet.

Like their affiliates did in other major cities, this morning, in a conference room above Downtown Crossing, Boston representatives from Change to Win, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), Jobs with Justice, Community Labor United (CLU), and the Massachusetts Immigrant and Refugee Advocacy (MIRA) coalition stepped up on their soap boxes.

On the table beside them, activists had piles of expired products that they claim to have bought at Boston CVS stores this week. The organizers were noticeably riled but also composed; after months of researching and calculating this full-steam offensive, it was time to strike.

CLU Organizing Director Darlene Lombos, who arrived with her under-the-weather newborn strapped to her chest, blasted CVS Caremark for keeping MinuteClinics out of immigrant locales. Jobs with Justice organizer Russ Davis took it further: “We’re putting CVS on notice,” he said. “We intend to hold them accountable.”

There are far too many allegations leveled in Change to Win’s report to mention them all here. Researchers packed a lot of damning and disturbing stuff in the 48-page document; from the chain’s reluctance to put 24-hour stores in communities of color, to how CVS blocks condom access in those same neighborhoods.

It must have felt refreshing for these folks to finally lash out. I’ve been calling Change to Win since November for a sneak peek at this report, and they’ve been hush. Unfortunately, though, for them, CVS got an early whiff and concocted a defense.

In a statement that begins “CVS Caremark respects the history and mission of the NAACP,” Spokesman Michael DeAngelis countered: “The allegation that we concentrate stores in white neighborhoods compared to our competitors is simply untrue;” and “Our policy is to remove items before the expiration date.”

Among other statements, DeAngelis also trumpeted the age-old CVS response about their disproportionate affixing of black products with anti-theft devices: “We carry a variety of ethnic products in our stores and ethnicity plays no role in loss-prevention procedures…The fact is that products are given security tags based on theft rates.”

This won’t be an easy battle for either side. For CVS, there’s the possibility that consumers might start paying attention for once (though that’s unlikely). For Change to Win, there’s the inevitable irony that comes from complaining about CVS while at the same time asking for more stores.

Whatever happens, hopefully this bout will attract heavy press. Especially around here, as CVS started in Lowell as a convenience store back in 1963, and currently operates its customer service department out of Rhode Island. Certainly, there should be an element of hometown shame kicking around.

To their credit – the Boston Globe has been on this story for months. In an excellent August 16 article titled “The price is right – mostly,” correspondent Mitch Lipka dropped some shocking numbers: “CVS Caremark corp., the nation’s biggest pharmacy chain, was fined more than $275,000 since January 2007 for nearly 2,800 alleged violations of Massachusetts rules on pricing accuracy – by far the most penalized of any retailer in the state.”

While CVS will likely dismiss Change to Win and continue paying fines and penalties, there might be too much evidence here for them to play dumb. In the least, this united front and large-scale approach should get do-gooders some leverage at the corporate table.

But the rest is up to everyone who Change to Win ultimately represents. Will people rise against CVS (or at least pursue further lines of inquiry), or will this hard work devolve into something like the left’s never ending war against Wal-Mart?

Click here to read the full post
by Chris Faraone | with no comments
December 04, 2008

My Family Vacation

 Epic poster by NASA....

 

Three weeks ago,  30+ members of my family headed to Cape Canaveral, Florida to see my uncle, Stephen Bowen, take his first flight into space aboard the space shuttle Endeavor.

The astronaut's families are treated to tours, mission briefings and free admission to the Kennedy Space Center the day before the launch. (IMAX!)

On the day of the launch, huge tour buses brought us all out to Banana Creek, a viewing area 3 miles away from the launch pad.

I imagine any space launch is a site to see, but we had the opportunity to see a night launch, schueduled for 7:55 on November 7, 2008.

Countdown clock at Banana Creek

Aaaand the launch...

My craptacular video does not serve the experience enough justice, especially in the sound department. I also obviously stopped paying attention to my camera about 20 seconds in, as you can see by the loss of a subject in the shot.

But basically, night turned to day and it was really really really loud. And so awesome.

Here's a photo from behind where we were standing from NASA's site

The pictures of the shuttle, such as this one, are taken by tons of cameras set up on a hill near the launch pad, set to automatically go off during the launch. Even at three miles away on Banana Creek, we could be hit with debris if something went wrong. And even when nothing has gone wrong, with strong enough winds, spectators have experienced acid rain! Luckily this launch went off without a (big) hitch.


Over the next eight minutes, everyone watches in anticipation as the shuttle completes its departure from the Earth's gravity. Five minutes into the flight, the shuttle drops its two solid rocket boosters. At the 8 minute mark they drop the external tank. And at this point the scary stuff is done and we can all go home... STS-126 was off to the International Space Station to perform maintenance and repairs, as well as install a toilet, a fridge, additional sleeping quarters, and a water filtration system. (Yes, the one that turns urine into drinking water)

I highly reccomend seeing a launch someday. You can buy tickets for $20 to view the launch from a place called the Causeway, which is six miles away from the launch pad. Or, just find a beach to sit on. Its awe-inspiring. Either way, NASA.gov has information on all of that stuff.

The shuttle landed on Sunday at 4:25 in California, all crew safe and sound, back on earth. The landing was diverted from Florida due to storms and high winds.

So, how do they get the huge shuttle back to the Kennedy Space Center, you ask? Well, space.com had the answer of course... just strap it to a 747!

 this horrible awesome photoshop job also courtesty of NASA.. its worth a chuckle or two

 Hmmmm....I wonder if they would hire me as a freelance photo-shopper?

 

Click here to read the full post
by Christine Atturio | with 1 comment(s)
December 04, 2008

Flashbacks: Boston chess champ squares off against a computer, the painful musical pairing of Paul McCartney and Michael Jackson, and the squabble over the Boston Tea Party Bicentennial festivities

CRUEL TO BE KIND
5 years ago
December 5, 2003 | Rebecca Paley profiled Dr. William Rashbaum, a long-time practicing, prominent second-trimester abortion provider.

“Husbands or boyfriends have been known to barge into his office and violently insist their baby not be aborted, to which Rashbaum replies with an equally violent, ‘Fuck you, Charlie, we can abort her.’ He won’t talk to them directly because, he explains, ‘I don’t treat men.’ But as Rashbaum talks privately to a patient...he shows another side, one that can sympathetically navigate highly emotional waters. An unabashed atheist, Rashbaum nonetheless has compassion for the religious conflicts that arise when women are told by priests not to have abortions. Gratitude comes in the form of files that have grown thick over the years with thank-you notes and birth announcements. Small, elaborate, hastily scribbled, or formal, the letters have arrived in many forms but all echo a similar sentiment: thank you for helping us through the most difficult time in our lives.” Read full article

PENTIUM SHMENTIUM
15 years ago
December 3, 1993 | Timothy Gower attended the Harvard Cup Versus Computer Chess Challenge, where Boston-based national chess champ Patrick Wolff was slated to square off against a computer powered by the powerful new Pentium chip.
“Two chess buffs were talking on the elevator at the Computer Museum. ‘Have you heard how the computers are doing?’ one asked.

“ ‘Well,’ the other responded, ‘I heard Patrick Wolff lost his first match.’ The two men arched their eyebrows and nodded.

“...[T]he rumor was true: a chess program called M-Chess Professional, considered one of the strongest programs in existence, had defeated Wolff that morning.

“ ‘I made a boo-boo...,’ Wolff said later. In the middle of executing a series of moves he thought would mate his computerized opponent, Wolff realized that he’d miscalculated...

“Event organizers remained poker-faced, but were undoubtedly tickled. The Harvard Cup is held in large part as a showcase for ever-improving artificial intelligence...Cup co-founders Dan Edelman and Christopher Chabrios spent the preceding week touting the speedy new Pentium computer chip from Intel...that would be driving the software this year. The faster a computer can consider possible moves, the tougher it is to beat. For the US champ to fall early was a sign that the humans might have met their match.

“Wolff was undaunted and unimpressed, however. He played five more games, winning four and playing to a draw in one. ‘I was surprised. I was expecting it to be harder,’ he said afterward. ‘Computers are getting quite good, especially with the Pentium chip. ... But this was way too easy.’ ”

KILLING US SOFTLY
25 years ago
December 6, 1983 | Joyce Millman weighed in on the awkward collaboration between Paul McCartney and Michael Jackson.

“Just as Mac can’t upstage Jack in the video...so he slinks away in defeat on the record. “Say Say Say” and “The Man” are tailored to Jackson like one of his punky, padded-shoulder tuxedos. The former song’s captivating but wispy melody threatens to dissolve under the weight of all the Thriller filler (vocoder, horns...) that McCartney and producer George Martin toss in as homage to Quincy Jones. McCartney sings smoothly, blandly, aiming for Jackson’s artless boyishness. Jackson, however bolsters his part with a dirty, grownup ferocity -- which McCartney can only mimic -- that briefly kicks some life into the song...If McCartney has any dignity, he won’t take on Jackson again -- but since he’s a cagy hitmaker...he probably will. He needs the young blood, the refreshed credibility -- that Jackson gives him. For they're part, Jackson and Wonder are equally affectionate members of this mutual admiration society; after all, they too grew up idolizing the Beatles. And Motown has always had a perverse weakness for pop schmaltz.”

SCHLOCK BLOCK
35 years ago
December 4, 1973 | Jim Sleepe reported on the rift developing between the state and something called the People’s Bicentennial Commission (PBC) over the festivities to be held on the 200th anniversary of the Boston Tea Party.

“Boston 200 is planning to commemorate the Tea Party by herding 3000 spectators into the Congress Street Bridge area to watch that costumed and choreographed National Guard dump something from the 75 foot replica of the Beaver, which will be docked next to the Salada Tea Company’s permanent exhibit and gift shop...[A]ll of the national media will be represented.

“Enter Ted Howard, Jeremy Rifkin, and the PBC, with a one-hundred fifty-foot vessel, the Unicorn, on loan from an unnamed private owner in New York, which they intend to dock next to the Beaver, bearing displays on impeachment and corporate power...A giant puppet of Nixon in royal robes...will emerge surrounded by oil drums and corporate effigies at the head of a noontime impeachment rally marching from Faneuil Hall along the route of the original colonists to the docks, and swarming into the midst of the dancers’ guardsmen’s choreography...

“ ‘Sure, the city’s defensive,’ chuckles Rifkin, ‘But it’s Catch 22; how the hell can they arrest people for being revolutionary at a commemoration of the Boston Tea Party?’ ”

Click here to read the full post
by Ian Sands | with 1 comment(s)
December 03, 2008

VIDEO: Lost Season Five preview


Lost's hotly-anticipated fifth season will debut in just over a month. Even though we're wondering how they could possibly top the fourth season, in which the show reinvented itself and refocused its storytelling approach, we aren't going to pretend not to be excited.

ABC has released a few promos for the season, and we can spare your ears the trailer set to a new song by the Fray because there's a more substantive one out that shows a scene from the season's premiere. Don't watch if you don't want to know, but if you do want to know you should be aware that it prominently involves Kate and Aaron. Prepare accordingly!

Click here to read the full post
by Ryan Stewart | with 1 comment(s)
December 02, 2008

Mass District Attorneys Still Fighting Question 2


For a group that struts around condemning pot smokers, the Massachusetts District Attorneys Association (MDAA) is one wacky bunch of lazy bureaucrats.

The State House News Service (SHNS) today delivered an expected whopper: Governor Deval Patrick, Attorney General Martha Coakley, and their incompetent minions can’t, or, more accurately, are unwilling to, accommodate policy adjustments required by the passage of Question 2.

Here we have a typical scenario in which government officials condescend to reporters (and, ultimately, to the public) as if we have no clue about the difficulty of their jobs. They’re basically claiming that people don’t understand the logistics required to get a damn thing done around here.

“There are very, very significant implementation problems,” MDAA Executive Director Geline Williams told the SHNS about marijuana decriminalization. Added Berkshire County District Attorney David Capeless: “There are some very serious issues which aren’t necessarily going to get resolved.”

This reaction would be understandable if their attitude was that, despite obstacles, officials are working hard to move from criminal to civil penalties. After all, they are required to set up counseling for youth offenders, and to train police officers not to cuff and stuff pot smokers caught with less than one ounce.

But, instead, district attorneys are essentially saying that since they don’t approve of Question 2, they’ll drag their feet as long as possible. Their message: We should leave flawed legislation in tact for their convenience.

“It seems to me that the district attorneys are still campaigning,” says Committee for Sensible Marijuana Policy (CSMP) Organizer Whitney Taylor. “They continue to use ‘The sky is going to fall’ rhetoric, which is clearly untrue. We wrote this [law] to fit into the current system. It can be implemented as is.”

We know that – in the lead up to this past election – district attorneys refused to consult authorities in the dozen states that have already adopted similar laws. But now it’s time to sponge the spilled milk and do some research. I’ll make it easy for them – here’s a web site with resources.   

Surely, Commonwealth officials are not suggesting that the Massachusetts courts and legal system are less sophisticated than those in Alaska, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Maine, Maryland, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington.  

Lastly, it’s time for some legislators to find enough courage to champion this measure. In addition to the fact that it’s no longer a political liability (65 percent of voters showed that they tolerate marijuana), this would be a sweet chance for a representative to prove that he or she can organize within this tragically flawed bureaucracy.

This law is supposed to hit the books 30 days from tomorrow, when the Governor’s Council finally certifies the November 4 election results. If someone – or, better yet, all of us – don’t step up soon and express some outrage we’re sure to see the will of voters be shamelessly disregarded.

Click here to read the full post
by Chris Faraone | with 1 comment(s)
December 01, 2008

Brian Skerry at the New England Aquarium

 

Fisheries are dwindling. The acidity of the ocean is getting worse. Pollution and dangerous bacteria levels are on the rise. (And, of course, there are pirates.)

The sea is in trouble. It may not always look like it from the surface, but down in the dark and chilly depths, it’s more threatened today than at anytime in world history.

Uxbridge native Brian Skerry has been an underwater photojournalist since he was 15, and has been contributing to National Geographic for more than a decade. Over the years, his travels have taken him from the Bahamas to Trinidad and Tobago to the waters off Scotland, where he’s submerged beneath the brine to swim alongside sharks and point his camera at schools of giant squid.


Skerry doesn’t like seeing his workplace in trouble. So tonight, at the New England Aquarium (where he’s also an overseer), he’ll be giving a talk, “Crucial Waters: Reporting On The World's Oceans,” where he’ll show off some of his stunning photographs as he tries to sound the alarm about ocean degradation and overfishing.

It starts at 7 p.m. and is free and open to the public. Register and get more information here.

Click here to read the full post
by Mike Miliard | with 1 comment(s)
December 01, 2008

The Case Against Cyber Monday


I’m begging sane people to avoid the term “Cyber Monday.” In fact, after finishing this blog post, I promise that I’ll never speak it again either. I only wish that television reporters would vow to do the same.

Every newscast that I checked this morning had a segment on this bogus holiday. CNN taught Cyber Monday preparation tips; FOX 25 News applauded folks for buying useless junk in this collapsing economy.

I’ve been thinking about shopping in the past few days since, on the morning after Thanksgiving with my family back in Queens, I woke up to screaming police sirens and low flying news choppers.

My aunt, uncle, and cousin live just blocks from the Green Acres Mall – a spot that was once locally infamous for moviegoers’ tendencies to fire at the screen, but that has now won national notoriety for its Wal-Mart customers’ trampling a store worker in their deadly quest for discount electronics.

It’s never settling to be so close to such hysterical ignorance. I know that New Yorkers are known for being rude and angry, but this was extreme. No doubt I’d be lambasting hicks and rednecks if this happened in the Midwest, so I’ll give it to my people here: You’re a bunch of damn Neanderthals.

For once I feel little need to extrapolate on a tragic situation; anyone who can’t figure on their own that it’s problematic when someone is senselessly murdered for material objects probably supports the Iraq war and doesn’t read The Phoenix anyway.

Still, with the dangers posed by stupid, selfish people physically shopping at stores, one might expect me to support Cyber Monday – which, the National Retail Association wants us to believe, is the day when we all log on and spend big.

But I don’t support this pseudo event, and, more so, I’m worried that it might start appearing on calendars. The term was forged by Shop.org in 2005 and already it’s a staple in our annual fluff news cycle.

My apprehension might seem crazy, but I wish more people had opposed Hallmark’s forcible ushering of Mother’s Day and Father’s Day into our consciousness. The same goes for Secretary’s Day; at first we might have laughed, but now receptionists abound (just like those greedy moms and dads) expect cards and candy.

In the least, if we must have made up holidays, I would appreciate some fun ones. How about Internet Porn Thursday or Question 2sday? Cyber Monday is a lazily named, obnoxiously superficial rallying call, and it should be trimmed from the American lexicon before it goes the way of “Black Friday.”

It’s time to stand up for ourselves and rage against consumer culture. So unless you’re looking for sweet deals from North Face and Amazon, which you can find here, please join me in the boycott that I’ll be joining right after I buy this exceptionally priced Sony MP3 player.  

Click here to read the full post
by Chris Faraone | with no comments
December 01, 2008

VIDEO: Boston Ballet's Nutcracker/Britney Mashup

And now for something completely different. Just before Thanksgiving, the Celtics handed over control of the halftime festivities to the Boston Ballet, who opted not to come out with a straight-up preview of their annual cash cow but instead offered a newly-choreographed routine outside their comfort zone. Perhaps taking a cue from the Celtics dancers, the Boston Ballet company performed an experimental hybrid of sorts -- for music, you'll recognize some Timbaland (via Keri Hilson), some Britney Spears, and a little bit of Nutcracker thrown in for good measure. Dance moves? This is about as close to MTV as you'll ever see the Ballet get. ThePhoenix.TV was there to bring back the highlights:

 

Click here to read the full post
by Carly Carioli | with no comments
November 27, 2008

VIDEO: Cartoon Network Live-Rick-Rolls Macy's Thanksgiving Parade


UPDATE: now with brief video!

In case you weren't watching the Macy's Parade, the Foster's Home for Imaginary Friends float rolled up, started doing a puppet routine, and then produced the ultimate Rick Roll: the actual Rick Astley, lip-synching the actual "Never Gonna Give You Up." Then one of the puppets yells, "I LOVE RICK ROLLING." Cartoon Network strikes again: all yr thankzgivinz parade belongz to us. Video here. OR IS IT? Well, no. But that particular instance has become the unofficial message board for discussion of said historic event.

Click here to read the full post
by Carly Carioli | with no comments
November 26, 2008

Dispatch From The Delusional Chuck Turner's Latest Press Conference

 

Chuck Turner didn’t call this morning’s press conference at his Dudley Square district office to talk about media harassment, like he did this past Monday outside City Hall. Instead, he came “to talk about media incompetence.”

But before he got to spanking those of us who have been reaming him in editorials, Turner reiterated his innocence: “I don’t have the slightest fear that I’ll spend one day in jail,” he said. Luckily, unlike FBI agents, his constituents don’t mind being lied to.  

In an effort to project more negative thoughts into your mind, as Turner suggests is my mission as a servant of my boss/editor/oppressor, I’ll address some statements that the councilor dropped this morning.

In a moment of profound bullshit, Turner said: “There have been no media stories regarding the relationship between the development of the Boston Workers Alliance (BWA) and my office.” Great point – unless, of course, you consider this Globe article, this Bay State Banner piece, or this Herald profile (which was generously written at the onset of Turner’s alleged media trial).

As for coverage of Turner’s initiatives – most specifically CORI reform – the councilor can simply check right here on the BWA press page. Maybe he should be concerned about how much his issues have been covered instead of bitching about how he’s been ignored (which isn’t true either).

My other favorite punchline was: “What to me is truly fascinating is that the media has not produced one story on the fact that I am the only Boston City Councilor who in the modern era has maintained an office in the community.” Turner might have wanted to search Boston.com before belting that one; he would have found this, this, and this.

I can’t believe I’m defending Fox 25 News (which, for all you screaming Turner nuts out there, is different than Fox News, by the way), but on Monday night they ran this reel featuring several occasions on which they’ve covered the councilor. Turner’s wife, who he said this morning monitors newscasts for him, must have missed that one.

Of course, much like the way Turner’s supporters wouldn’t believe that he took a bribe if they were standing right there, I’m sure they’re unwilling to follow the above links and discover what a phoney their representative is. A sign hanging outside the District 7 office this morning revealed their mentality: “Chuck Turner is the Only Politician I’ve Ever Trusted.”

Near the end of his tirade, after blasting the media for not running with yesterday’s Ron Wilburn developments (even though he admitted that they did), Turner spoke about assembling a Boston Critical Thinkers Network in which operatives would scrutinize the media. You know – because members of the press are incapable of thinking critically.

While I have little doubt that such a network will never materialize into anything substantial, I will recommend that they begin by analyzing everything that Turner says during his latest crusade “to speak truth and justice.”

Also – on a side note – am I crazy or is it outrageously ironic to talk about critical thinking while standing next to a guy wearing a clerical collar? I can’t speak for my colleagues on this one, but NOBODY WHO BELIEVES IN JESUS CHRIST IS IN ANY POSITION TO TELL ME ABOUT CRITICAL THINKING!!!

Turner should have just pulled the race card; it would have been completely acceptable as long as Sal DiMasi remains the most powerful big dick swinger on Beacon Hill. Trust me – Boston’s thinking community is well aware that federal agents are targeting black politicians.

But pulling the media card is as ridiculous as it’s transparent. For one, the majority of his allegations are laughably unfounded. And for two, he’s just making himself look crazier than he did every time he dropped foreign policy gems at city council meetings.  

Turner initiated his press predicament before he was arrested, before he kicked us around City Hall Plaza, and before he defended Dianne Wilkerson (which he’s still doing). All we’ve ever had to do to make him look foolish was stick tape recorders in his face.

Click here to read the full post
by Chris Faraone | with 1 comment(s)
November 25, 2008

Hulu for film geeks? Criterion Collection launches new streaming-video "online cinemateque"!

 

Spoiler alert: if you're a film geek, the rest of your work day is about to go up in flames. 

Criterion launched a long-awaited new web site this morning, taking the first step towards digital distribution for the most coveted catalogue in film. Warning: It's still in wicked beta. But the plan is to let users stream full-length movies -- as well as Criterion's extras, from the accompanying essays to the directors' commentaries, behind-the-scenes vids, and short features -- on demand. For launch, there's a limited number of full-movie streams, a ton of trailers, and more essays than you can possibly read in 2009 (from the notes to their first-ever laser-disc, a 1984 reissue of Citizen Kane that set the standard for home-market film scholarship, to Scorcese going apeshit for Bottle Rocket). If you're into top 10 lists, there's a ton of suggestions by everyone from Frank Kozik and Neil Labute to Jane Campion and Richard Linklatter. Here's the catch: for the streams, there's a price attached -- $5 per film for a week's worth of unlimited viewing, via a download that's apparently DRM'd to self-destruct after the rental period is up. (Note: we haven't tried it yet.) Supplemental vids are expected to be going up soon, with a price point around $1.50. No, it's probably not going to replace your Netflix membership anytime soon. And yes, $5 is a little on the pricey side for an industry that's rapidly embracing the free-online-content model, but: 1) read the next graph, they're not stupid; 2) you can put your rental charges towards purchase of actual Criterion DVDs, a la rent-to-own; and 3) Criterion has always been the Rolls-Royce of DVD imprints, so they're probably guessing their audience will pay a little extra for quality. 

We're burying the lead here a little, because as it happens, Criterion is also embracing free by partnering with an upstart Palo Alto film-geek social network, www.TheAuteurs.com. Registered users can watch rotating, Criterion-curated online "film festivals" for free -- currently it's a Telluride Film Festival retrospective -- and yes, that means full-length features. The film festivals are ad-supported -- but the ads are trailers, and there's only one of them (at least that's how we found it when we went to watch the 1922 Buster Keaton classic Cops this morning), which is better than a movie theater and comparable to, say, Hulu -- only with WAAAAAAY better films, obviously.

Which begs the question, Why not do the same thing on the Criterion site itself? Our sources tell us the two sites are sharing revenue, so it may not matter in the end: Criterion is positioned to be a helluva retail hub, not to mention a valuable film-criticism library (did we mention: more cinema essays than you could read in a year?), and maybe they'll make a dent with online rentals . . . and if not, they've already got a stake in the free-distro model at TheAuteurs. Design-wise, both sites are stark, sleek, movie-star pretty. They were jointly designed by the folks behind TheAuteurs, and they're tied together with some seriously enviable feature-sharing -- for instance, Criterion's catalog links directly to TheAuteurs' forums, and at this point it looks like most of TheAuteurs' film content is powered by Criterion's data and video.

With the sites barely online, it's probably a little early for wish lists, but we're gonna make a quick one anyway: Hulu's player feels like it's gonna be the industry standard, so we'd love to see the trailers and free movies become embeddable -- even if the freebies expire after Criterion's limited-time "film festivals" cycle off. We're also assuming that TheAuteurs will eventually let us list favorite directors who aren't in their (Criterion's?) database: someone let us give a shout-out to DA Pennebaker, plz! 

Come back after you check it out and let us know what you think . . . and if you sign up for TheAuteurs, we need some more friends. Hint, hint. 

Click here to read the full post
by Carly Carioli | with no comments
November 25, 2008

Help Save the Louis D. Brown Peace Institute

 

As some people might already know from this Globe article (or just heard around the neighborhood), the Louis D. Brown Peace Institute is one of many community programs that got whacked in this last round of state budget cuts.

In short: the Fields Corner institute has for nearly 15 years been a place where desperate families seek emotional and financial support when senseless violence hits home, and it needs roughly $75,000 to be saved.

While there certainly needs to be discussion about why programs such as this lose out to less important, less urban budgetary items, right now the main concern is to raise funds. For that reason the kind folks from H. Levenbaum Real Estate in Dorchester are throwing a fundraiser.

Next Tuesday, December 2, at the Blarney Stone (1505 Dorchester Ave.) you have a chance to help out and drink up from 7pm to 9pm. Any and all donations are welcome. For more info on other ways to give click here.

Click here to read the full post
by Chris Faraone | with no comments
November 25, 2008

TiVo goes mobile, TV officially takes over your entire life

You know when TV is taking over your life when you can't even wait to get to a computer in order to program your TiVo, let alone be at home to program it. Yesterday, TiVo announced it will be launching a cell phone-friendly Web site, m.tivo.com, available for all cell phone browsers and users so TV worshippers can program their TiVos using their cell phones. 

Of course TiVo users can already program their DVR machines remotely by logging onto TiVo's home page, www.tivo.com, (which is basically what this new cell phone system is doing, it's just using a mobile-friendly version).

Really? Is TV taking over our lives so much that we have to program our sets using our cell phones? We can't even wait to get to a computer before plugging our TiVo to record Paris Hilton's My New BFF? How sad it is that our lives are so revolved around make-believe that we so urgently need to program, watch and discuss TV shows with our mobile devices? Don't get me wrong, I think the technology available is amazing, I'm just a little sad for mankind and the culture-less void we are dropping into as we sit at home watching endless hours of fantasy life.

Maybe it's just me, but it seems to me we should be less worried about missing a program on TV and more worried about getting out of our living rooms and connecting to the outside world....just a thought.

 

Click here to read the full post
by Lisa Spinelli | with no comments
November 24, 2008

Chuck Turner and Maureen Feeney vs. The Media and One Another

 

Anyone who believes that only Republicans detest the press should have checked the scene outside Boston City Hall today. Maybe reporters aren’t as biased as talk-radio blowhards allege; in the wake of City Councilor Chuck Turner’s arrest, even liberals who cheer when we expose right-wing tomfoolery are tormenting us like Howie Carr does union bosses.

Like any shrewd politician, Turner knows when to manipulate the media and when to blast us; and he simultaneously did both this afternoon in front of several dozen journalists and droves of eager loyalists. But before doing so, the secondary object of Turner’s aggression, City Council President Maureen Feeney, used a similar tactic.

Feeney got the jump on Turner’s 2:30pm Government Center rally with a 1pm press conference in City Hall’s Curley Room. At the onset she indicated that she respects Turner’s right to claim innocence, but soon after iterated that the current situation and FBI investigation compromise his councillorship.

Feeney’s message was mostly clear: Neither she nor her peers will negotiate Turner’s future at this juncture. Still, her attempt to defend the hypocritical decision to preemptively strip Turner of his committee assignments caused her to fumble some.

It’s good that Turner’s representatives relayed Feeney’s blunders to him. Her implication that she canceled this afternoon’s council meeting because his supporters might “turn the session into something that it is not” is absolutely noteworthy – even if she subsequently denied the statement and blamed the press for provoking her fear of pandemonium.  

I only wish Turner’s informants also told him that several reporters questioned Feeney about her double talk. Since nobody delivered that message, though, Turner challenged the press to confront her as if we’d bought her nonsense wholesale. It seems journalists are not the only ones who are merely interested in half the story.  

Hardly satisfied with Feeney’s calling off today’s meeting, Turner stepped to his crowd as planned. Even before a working microphone arrived, he launched into a condemnation of his colleagues and the pad-and-camera-wielding culprits who he deems responsible for his predicament.

The crowd was energized. Everyone expected fireworks, as the councilor’s operatives circulated an announcement declaring war against the media. “My main concern is that I am not being tried by a jury of my peers, I am being tried by the Globe, the Herald, Fox News, Channel 7, Channel 5, etc…,” Turner wrote and went on to say.

Vocal support rang loudly. Some folks belted pro-Chuck chants, while others were noticeably angrier. When it became obvious that the sound system was busted, one participant suggested that evildoers “Stop controlling the truth and let him be heard.” “Get him a mic,” another person yelled.   

The crowd reacted enthusiastically as Turner spoke about his dedication to constituents and objective to “liberate [his] people.” But the heaviest roars came when the councilor attacked reporters for harassing his family to the point that he had to call police yesterday. Turner even blamed the media for forgetting to zip his pants this morning.

For the record – many “employees of rich media corporations” understand why so many people are enraged. Some of us have indeed dropped unfavorable opinions about the circling scandals. The remaining question is if Turner’s supporters will in turn understand the inevitable backlash that results when politicians refer to journalists as “criminals.”    

In a line that I’m sure will be remembered long after this ordeal is over, Turner said: “Obviously, the press is working to publicly destroy my reputation before I even have an opportunity to have a day in court. Since I am being tried by the media and my fellow Councilors, I have made the decision to publicly defend myself. That is I will act as my own lawyer in this media trial in which I find myself.”

I can’t speak for other reporters in this city, but I’m willing to face Turner in his metaphorical courtroom. The only problem is that he already acquitted himself by predicting that he might go down for a crime he did not commit. In his eyes, and as far as many of his devotees are concerned, he’ll emerge a persecuted martyr regardless of whether he’s found guilty in the court of law or the court of public opinion.

As for his battle with Feeney, so far it looks like Turner might be winning that bout too. Not just because of her unilateral move to strip his committee assignments, but because of her piss-poor justification for doing so. Few would disagree – including those of us who are out to ruin Turner for no reason whatsoever – that he saw Feeney’s soft spot and stuck his finger in it.

My prediction: This is one shit fight that holiday spirit will not blow over. If you’re a member of the media or a citizen who’s interested in or concerned about Turner and the fate of black leadership in this city, the only thing to look forward to is a 10-way winter war and accusatory hail storm that will most likely last well into next year. Dress warmly. This one promises to be contentious and quarrelsome.  

Click here to read the full post
by Chris Faraone | with 1 comment(s)
November 24, 2008

Rahmbo @#$% speaks!

Not quite sure why this was axed from SNL on Saturday, because it's the funniest thing they've written since the election.

Now that's some @#$% change we can believe in.

Maybe Mr. Emanuel can pay a visit to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue and kindly request that George Bush either do some @#$% governing over these next couple months, or else step aside and let the President Elect take the reigns? Because I like the new economic team, but I'm sorta starting to worry that by January 20 things'll be so @#$% that all the exactingly competent pragmatic centrist brainiacs in the world won't be able to help us.

In other news: Much as I love Fred Armisen, I have to concur that a new Barack audition is perhaps a wise move.

(In the mean time, could the SNL writers please give Chris Eliott's daughter a couple lines, instead of relegating her to extra status?)

Click here to read the full post
by Mike Miliard | with no comments
More Posts Next page »
ABOUT THIS BLOG
SUBSCRIBE




Friday, December 05, 2008  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2008 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group