The Phoenix Network:
 
 
 
About  |  Advertise
 
Letters  |  Media -- Dont Quote Me  |  News Features  |  Talking Politics  |  The Editorial Page  |  This Just In

Women on the verge

Clinton die-hards have created a new-girls’ network bent on remedying decades of sexism by putting women in elected office
By DAVID S. BERNSTEIN  |  August 20, 2008

080822_women_main

At next week’s Democratic National Convention in Denver, Hillary Clinton’s delegates will get just about everything they’ve wanted — aside from the nomination of their candidate, of course. Barack Obama has agreed to let them officially cast their votes for Clinton on an open ballot, rather than have the delegates nominate him by acclimation, as is often done when the other candidates have conceded. He has also given prime speaking slots to both Bill and Hillary, and agreed to concessions in the party platform that include an implicit acknowledgement of sexism during the primary battle (without assigning any specific blame).

Tsongas vs. Donoghue
This past year’s election of Niki Tsongas to US Congress was a triumph of gender politics — and a blueprint of how women can co-opt the locker-room style long practiced by Bay State boys.

“When the rumors started about Marty Meehan leaving, the phones of the women’s network were lighting up across Massachusetts — that this was our chance," says Jesse Mermell, Brookline selectman and former executive director of the Massachusetts Women’s Political Caucus.

There were plenty of good women in the district, including several state senators and former Lowell mayor Eileen Donoghue. But only Tsongas, widow of former US Senator Paul Tsongas, had what matters to the back-room party insiders: personal connections, fundraising ability, and general-election name recognition.

So, well before the campaigns even started, the state’s most influential women began lining up the party apparatus behind Tsongas — and convincing other women not to run.

Donoghue ran anyway, but she was — just like the three men in the primary race — up against the state’s Democratic political machinery. Even EMILY’s List, a national organization supporting women candidates, actively raised money for Tsongas to beat another woman. It might not have been nice, or dainty, but the end result was a woman heading to Washington.

That should satisfy the 19 pledged Clinton delegates from Massachusetts — particularly the 14 women in that group, for whom the ability to register their vote next Thursday for a fellow female has come to symbolize both the progress and challenges of women in politics.

But when they come back home at the end of the week, they will return to a state that remains, for all its progressive reputation, a throwback when it comes to gender politics. Compared with other states that have seen far more advancement, Massachusetts is still a back-slapping man’s world, where women make up less than a quarter of the state legislature, a handful of mayors, and a small (though increasing) minority of back-room players such as staff, campaign managers, fundraisers, and lobbyists. Over the past 20 years, the number of women in Congress more than tripled, from 24 to 91 — while in Massachusetts the number stayed at zero until this past year.

Some of those Clinton delegates, along with other powerful and influential women in the state, say that, once the Clinton campaign officially ends in Denver, they’re taking on Massachusetts next.

“The complacency that women had — that the work of the women’s movement was done — Hillary Clinton made it clear that this is still a relevant issue,” says Jesse Mermell, Brookline selectman and former executive director of Massachusetts Women’s Political Caucus (MWPC), a 37-year-old organization.

MWPC is a bipartisan group that supports women candidates across the aisle; but these Clinton backers are strictly partisan. They aim to fill elective offices in the state with Democratic women.

The work is already starting, with new organizations and programs. But what would take it to the next level — what could make it a potent force in state politics — is if this cadre transfers the unified energy they had for Clinton to the task of getting women elected in their home state.

That won’t be easy; already they are in disagreement about defining their goals, how to proceed, and even whom to include as allies in their effort. But some say that, after Denver, all that will change.

“It is time for us to be at the table making the decision about who is going to run and get elected in upcoming contests,” says Sheila Capone-Wulsin, who took over as MWPC executive director in March. “We’re done asking. We’re saying we are going to have a seat at the table.”

Recent change
Just in the past two years, Massachusetts has seen a series of individual gains for women in politics, most prominently Niki Tsongas’s election to Congress, Therese Murray’s to State Senate president, Martha Coakley’s to attorney general, and Maureen Feeney’s to Boston City Council president.

“I think women are feeling their political power,” says Coakley.

With less fanfare, the Deval Patrick administration chose women for 276, or just over half, of its management-level appointments in 2007 — thanks in part to a special project led by MWPC, called MassGAP.

1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |   next >
Related:
  • Senate shuffle
    Massachusetts hasn’t had a Senate-seat vacancy in nearly 25 years. Now we may have two. Let the speculation begin.
  • That’s what he said
    Barack Obama sounds just like Deval Patrick. Is that good or bad?
  • Who’s with whom
    When John Kerry bowed out of the presidential sweepstakes, it freed Boston’s big Democratic brokers to find a favorite.
  • More more >
  Topics: Talking Politics , U.S. Government , U.S. State Government , Barack Obama ,  More more >
  • Share:
  • RSS feed Rss
  • Email this article to a friend Email
  • Print this article Print
Comments
Re: Women on the verge
Not to do any disservice to Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr.'s enlightening speach on its 45th anniversary, but shouldn't we elect representatives based on the the content of their hearts and minds, rather than the contents of their drawers? As a male, I have never voted for people because they are of the same gender. I have several - albeit, short-sighted - criteria: who will keep their hands off my income, punish criminals, and make the world (starting with my neighborhood) a safe place for my children. In order to get representation that shares my views, I have crossed party lines, as well as voted for men and women. I told a co-worker today that I would like to see voting done where an individual walk into the booth and is facing a matrix that has ten to twenty bullet points that show the candidates' position on key issues. There would be no names, no pictures, no party identifications, just column A with issue positions and column B with issue positions (sure, there would be other columns for the other candidates on the ballot, too). Can you imagine a campaign without the overboard hype and candidates actually identifying themselves by where they truly stand?  In closing, should I feel that a woman candidate shares my views and will effectively enact laws that uphold them, I would have no problem voting for her. For at that point she is not a "woman" candidate, she is "the" candidate.        
By Garrett_in_AZ on 08/28/2008 at 8:27:49

Today's Event Picks
ARTICLES BY DAVID S. BERNSTEIN
Share this entry with Delicious

 See all articles by: DAVID S. BERNSTEIN

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 



Friday, December 05, 2008  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2008 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group